Monat: Januar 2025

Blogpost written by Daniel Mantey Mensah and Abhushan Maharjan

Remote work has become an essential part of modern life, thanks to advances in technology. It’s great because it gives freedom and saves us from long commutes. However, some people have difficulty turning off from work and enjoying time with their family and friends. This review looks at how remote work affects us, how we feel, think, connect with others, grow in our jobs, and even stay healthy. It shows the good parts and the challenges of this new way of working.

Key Points:

• Remote work is growing rapidly thanks to technology, but its impact on well-being is mixed.
• It offers flexibility and autonomy but can lead to loneliness and blur the boundaries between work and personal life.
• Employers and workers can balance the scale by addressing both the challenges and benefits of working remotely.
• Knowledge workers are people whose jobs involve thinking, learning, and creating. They’re a great fit for remote work because they can use technology to get things done efficiently.

---

The Rise of Remote Work

Waking up, getting some coffee and starting your workday without leaving home: This is now a reality for many knowledge workers. Thanks to rapid technological advancements, remote work has become commonplace, transforming how we live and work. Currently, 19.5% of the global workforce works remotely, and by 2025, an estimated 32.6 million Americans—about 22% of the U.S. workforce are expected to do the same. This shift has made working from home more feasible and efficient. But what does this new way of working mean for our well-being?

This was the question explored by researchers Maria Charalampous and her team. To figure it out, they looked at 63 different studies about how working remotely affects people’s well-being. They carefully picked these studies, which included a mix of surveys, interviews, and other research methods. The team focused on five key areas: how remote work affects emotions, thinking, relationships, career growth, and physical health. By pulling together insights from all these studies, they discovered both the upsides and downsides of working from home. Let’s take a closer look at what they found;

The Flexibility Trap: Where Remote Work’s Perks Meet its Pitfalls

Remote work has a lot to offer such as flexible schedules, no long commutes and the freedom to wear casual clothes to formal meetings. Sounds perfect, right? Not quite. While remote work has proved to boost job satisfaction and autonomy, it comes with challenges like loneliness, stress and an “always-on” culture, the research shows.

The breakdown is as follows:

 Our Feeling (Affective Well-Being)

On the other side of the coin, when it comes to feeling better, remote work makes people happier with their jobs—no office drama and more comfort. Technology has made it easier to stay connected, which is a plus. But there’s bad news; many remote workers report feeling isolated and emotionally drained, mostly because they don’t get enough support from colleagues. It’s a mix of feeling good and missing the human connection.

 Our Thinking (Cognitive Well-Being)

Although research on cognitive well-being was limited at the time, it revealed that remote work enables greater focus by eliminating office distractions. This benefits tasks requiring high concentration. However, being constantly connected through work emails and chats can lead to mental fatigue and difficulty “switching off.”

Our Relationships (Social Well-Being)

Work relationships tend to suffer in remote work. The opportunities for informal learning, skill development, information sharing, and mentoring are usually missed in this scenario. The absence of face-to-face interaction makes it difficult to bring about trust and companionship. However, strong organizational support can help remote workers feel less isolated.

Our Career Goals (Professional Well-Being)

The freedom to manage tasks and schedules gives those working remotely a feeling of job satisfaction. But, this autonomy sometimes comes with a price. Many remote workers worry about being “out of sight, out of mind,” fearing they might be overlooked for promotions or critical projects. The lack of visibility in the workplace can create concerns about career growth and advancement.

Our Physical Health (Psychosomatic Well-Being)

Yes! Sitting at home and being indoors all day might save you from the office flu, but it comes with its set of physical challenges. Poorly set up home workspaces may lead to problems such as back pain, neck strain, or headaches. If proper ergonomic furniture is not used, or if movement is not done regularly, these problems can add up over time.

Finding the Balance: Where Freedom Meets Structure in Remote Work

So how do we find a way to make working remotely work for all concerned? It’s all about balance. There are responsibilities on both sides of the employment divide.

For Employers: Build a culture that supports connection, celebrates achievements, and respects work-life boundaries. Small gestures, like acknowledging great work with a quick “well done,” can boost morale and help employees feel valued. Providing tools and resources to maintain team cohesion, like regular check-ins and virtual team-building activities.

For Remote Workers: Take control of your workspace and routine. Set up a comfortable and distraction-free area to work, stick to a schedule, and make time for social interactions. Even a simple virtual coffee chat with a coworker can help you feel more connected. Don’t forget to set boundaries to “log off” and recharge after your workday. 

To Conclude

Remote work is no longer just a trend; it’s shaping the future of how we work and live. While it offers benefits like flexibility and greater autonomy, it also presents challenges such as isolation, difficulty switching off, and concerns about career growth. By addressing these issues through stronger organizational support, better ergonomic setups, and clearer boundaries between work and life, we can harness the potential of remote work to improve well-being and productivity. The key is finding the right balance between freedom and structure to ensure a healthier and happier workforce.

What’s your experience with remote work? Do you think the benefits outweigh the challenges? Let’s discuss this in the comments below!

 

References
Katherine Haan (2023). Remote Work Statistics and Trends in 2025. Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/remote-work-statistics

Naveen Kumar (2024). 25+ Remote Work Statistics & Trends (2025). DemandSage. https://www.demandsage.com/remote-work-statistics

 Maria Charalampous, Christine A. Grant, Carlo Tramontano & Evie Michailidis (2019) Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28:1, 51-73, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886

Image Reference: Generated By bing.com/images

Blogpost written by Briam Daniel Falcó Martínez and Owen Mabbott

Key Points:

• Digital transformation = good for motivation (usually). It gives us a chance to learn new things and share our ideas, which helps companies innovate and grow.
• But nobody likes feeling spied on. If we feel like we’re constantly being watched, it can make us less likely to learn and share our thoughts.
• It’s all about finding the right balance. Companies need to embrace digital transformation without going overboard on the surveillance. Give employees some breathing room, and they’ll be more likely to contribute to a truly innovative workplace.

---

Digital transformation brings a lot of opportunities for companies, that’s no secret. It has the potential to revolutionise the work environment if done correctly. It offers new ways to obtain data about every process and the employees working on them. In this regard, it makes tracking employees‘ performance more effective, reinforces adherence to rules, and simplifies the process of providing feedback. But nobody wants to feel like they’re living in an Orwellian nightmare at work. Imagine constantly being watched, every keystroke analysed, every bathroom break timed…

This is not far from the reality for warehouses that are reportedly coerced to use wristbands for real-time tracking. Similar monitoring, although less extreme is also happening in more common workplaces, where phone calls are used to monitor performance and personal information is used for e-recruitment and data mining. New, innovative digital tools bring a lot to the table, but given these intrusive practices, those „innovative“ new tools don’t seem so cool anymore, do they?

Let’s talk about the elephant in the (digitally monitored) room: surveillance. This refers to using technology to closely and constantly monitor a wide range of someone’s activities, behaviours, and personal traits. Now, how does surveillance affect digital transformation? This scientific paper provides us with interesting insights: „Big Brother is Watching You: Surveillance via Technology Undermines Employees’ Learning and Voice Behavior During Digital Transformation„. The study, based on a survey of 100 employees across different sectors, takes a deep dive into how surveillance impacts our motivation to learn and share opinions at work. In turn, providing an understanding of the negative implications for digital transformation efforts.

Digital Transformation and Learning Orientation

Digital transformation is a hot topic these days. But beyond the buzzword, it’s really about using new technology and ways of working to bring about change in the workplace. And for employees, this can actually be a chance to learn and grow.

Think of it this way: digital transformation often disrupts our usual routines, prompting us to rethink how we do things and develop new skills. Interestingly, human beings have a natural desire to learn and develop. So, when faced with digital transformation, many of us are motivated to embrace these changes and acquire new skills. This disposition to learn is crucial. If there is no motivation to learn how to get the best of the digital transformation efforts, then the whole process becomes more difficult.

The publishing industry mentioned in the study is a great example. Despite being significantly impacted by digital innovation, employees in this sector have demonstrated a strong motivation to learn and adapt, contributing new ideas and ways of working. The disruption caused by the new digital reality was overpowered by the motivation of the employees to learn.

Surveillance and Voice Behaviour

Picture this: after a long day of learning how to implement the new digital tools, you decide to go for a walk to take some air. During the walk, you come up with a brilliant new suggestion to improve the project. Would you be willing to share it with your boss if he was right next to you, breathing down your neck throughout the walk? Chances are, you wouldn’t even had come up with any idea to begin with. The likelihood is you would be more concerned with your expected behaviour rather than reflecting on what you learned.

When people feel they are being monitored, they are less motivated to speak up. That’s right, just the simple perception of being watched impacts our „Voice Behaviour“. This is a big potential drawback of implementing new digital tools. Many new digital tools gather a significant amount of data, which can lead to concerns about surveillance. For companies and managers, a new paradox arises: digital transformation requires and leads to more data being collected, and more data collection leads to employees feeling watched, which undermines the whole process.

Striking the right balance:

While research on this topic is still growing, we encourage companies to consider the following:

• Communication is key! Create a workplace where people feel comfortable sharing their ideas without being judged. Information coming from open and constant communication is more valuable than information collected through surveillance.
• Be upfront about data. Nobody likes to feel spied on. Be open about how you’re using digital tools and why. Remember, just the perception of being under surveillance impacts digital transformation projects negatively.
• Make learning engaging. As the paper indicates, everybody wants to learn and improve their skills. If certain efforts to implement technologies aren’t working, maybe it has more to do with the way it’s being approached. Make sure that the way training is evaluated doesn’t contribute to a feeling of being surveilled.

This is a great way to make employees feel like their voices matter. When people feel valued and heard, they’re more likely to share ideas that lead to real innovation. It’s a win-win for everyone.

In conclusion:

Digital transformation requires motivated, ready-to-learn employees. They need to feel comfortable enough to identify room for improvement. Paradoxically, this digital transformation process can accidently (or not) introduce elements that can be perceived as surveillance, shattering the motivation to learn and share ideas required to make the process successful. Companies need to be mindful of this and strive for a balance between utilising new tools effectively and respecting employee privacy and autonomy.

 

Further reading: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20230127-how-worker-surveillance-is-backfiring-on-employers

References: Kensbock, J. M., & Stöckmann, C. (2020). “Big brother is watching you”: surveillance via technology undermines employees’ learning and voice behavior during digital transformation. Journal of Business Economics, 91(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-01012-x

Blogpost written by Chennampalli Bhanu Prakash Reddy and Mohammed Imthiyaz Basha

Key Points

• Human-AI collaboration exceeds in performance either of them individually.
• Humans often lack metaknowledge, which is the ability to assess their own capabilities, in making apt delegation of tasks.
• AI outperforms humans in delegating tasks.

---

In many professions, repetitive tasks dominate the workday, leaving little room for more difficult and meaningful tasks that require true expertise. Consider doctors who spend hours looking at medical images, processing lab results, or dealing with routine diagnoses that do not require their full attention. Every day, customer service representatives answer routine inquiries. These tasks, while important, are monotonous and lead to decreased job satisfaction. And that’s where artificial intelligence comes in, providing an alternative by taking on these routine tasks. By automating these tasks, AI allows professionals to focus on what is truly important—whether that is solving complex medical cases or assisting customers in need.

However, as AI is increasingly integrated into our day-to-day work, a very important question arises: how do we balance human expertise with the capabilities of AI? Is it up to the humans to determine which tasks to outsource to AI, or can AI learn when to ask for human intervention? In healthcare, for example, it could be that AI handles the routine cases and flags complicated ones for the doctors. Similarly, in customer support, AI can handle repetitive inquiries while sensitive issues will need to be handled by human agents.

When human intelligence complements the work of AI or vice versa, the outcomes become powerful, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness. This balance between technology and human skills needs careful thought to make sure the partnership leads to the best possible results while trust and control are maintained.

The promise of Human-Al Collaboration

The idea of human and AI collaboration is a simple one: humans possess tactical knowledge due to their experiences and AI processes vast amounts of data and identifies patterns. Human thoughts are the most diverse that are partially visible in their actions. So humans may have knowledge that complements AI algorithms. Collaboration of work between humans and AI can leverage these complementarities and their joint performance may exceed the performance of either of them individually.

In the study by Fügener et al. (2022), human participants performed image classification tasks in collaboration with an AI system. The research was conducted in a controlled experimental setting to analyze decision-making processes in human-AI collaboration. Participants were required to decide when to delegate tasks to the AI and how to integrate its recommendations into their decision-making.

The experiments revealed that task delegation between humans and AI led to improved outcomes. When humans delegate tasks to AI (delegation), results surpass those of humans working alone. Likewise, when AI delegates tasks to humans (inversion), performance exceeds that of AI acting independently.

But here’s the twist from Fügener et al (2022): When humans delegate tasks to AI the performance does not quite improve. However, when AI delegates tasks to humans accuracy has improved significantly in image classification.

The Delegation Dilemma: Why Humans Struggle

Why do you think this disparity is prevalent? The key seems to lie in something known as meta knowledge. Meta knowledge basically is the ability to assess one’s capabilities about knowing what you know and crucially what you don’t know. This ties closely to Polanyi’s Paradox, which says that humans know more than they can explicitly articulate. In other words, we can perform complex tasks intuitively, but we often struggle to explain how we do them. Before humans delegate to AI they need to be able to judge whether they can solve a problem or not.

The research reveals that a significant meta knowledge gap exists, humans are surprisingly bad at assessing their own abilities especially with the difficult tasks. This leads to inappropriate delegations which results in poor performance of Human-AI collaboration in predictions.

The AI Advantage

• Accurate Self assessment: In contrast to humans the AI is pretty good at assessing itself; it knows when it is likely to get an answer wrong and can then delegate to humans to attempt the difficult tasks. For instance, an AI can easily delegate tasks to humans when the prediction confidence falls below a certain threshold; otherwise, it continues handling the predictions independently.
• Consistent Delegation: Sometimes humans fail in delegation of tasks because of their overconfidence, uncertainty and mistrust of AI algorithms. But AI does not suffer from this problem, since AI can accurately assess its own performance, delegation strategies (delegate when the threshold value is not met) and not be hampered by cognitive biases like humans.
• Reliability: AI’s capacity to handle enormous amounts of data with consistency and precision makes it extremely trustworthy. Unlike humans, AI is unaffected by fatigue or emotional influences, resulting in consistent performance over time. Its ability to learn from massive volumes of data also allows it to develop and adapt to new difficulties, assuring long-term performance.

Can delegation strategies reinforce humans in collaboration?

The study by Fügener et al (2022), highlights how AI improves by taking help from humans. When the confidence level of AI falls below a certain threshold, it knows that it requires humans to complete the task. On the other hand, Humans often make poor choices in delegating tasks to AI. They tend to keep challenging tasks with them and assign easier ones to AI. This is not due to mistrust of AI, but because they fail to understand their own abilities of handling different tasks. By figuring out better ways of delegating tasks, humans could work more effectively with AI.

To address this issue, researchers examined two groups of participants. One group was simply explained delegation strategies, while the other was instructed to follow them. Both groups showed some improvements in both accuracy and delegation rates. Accuracy increased slightly, while delegation rates saw a significant rise. Interestingly, the delegation rates in the enforced strategy condition (second group) were similar to those in the explained strategy condition (first group), indicating that participants were effectively following the suggested delegation rules and were not reluctant to use AI in their work areas. This suggests that clear guidance, along with enforced practices, helps humans make better decisions when collaborating with AI.

Creating a Collaborative Future: Humans and AI in Sync

To truly unlock the potential of Human-AI collaboration, we must first address the gap in meta-knowledge. This involves developing AI systems that provide tailored feedback, helping humans better understand their strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, designing systems that enable AI to proactively delegate tasks to humans, based on its assessment of both its own capabilities and the human’s, will improve efficiency and collaboration.

Whether in healthcare, business, or other fields, the question is not whether humans or AI perform better individually, but how they can work together to achieve better results. The key is to strike the right balance, combining AI precision and human intuition to create a partnership that truly outperforms its individual parts.

 

Investigate further

 Andreas Fügener, Jörn Grahl, Alok Gupta, Wolfgang Ketter (2022) Cognitive Challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation. Information Systems Research 33(2):678-696. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1079